Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 03:13

Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
For the First Time, Scientists Spot Water Around a Young Star Similar to Our Sun - The Daily Galaxy
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Israel launches several attacks on Beirut’s southern suburbs, south Lebanon - Al Jazeera
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
How can someone in your family purposely try to destroy your reputation?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Why Passing on Palantir Technologies Stock (PLTR) is a Big Mistake - Yahoo Finance
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Why do all the stupid people think Donald J. Trump is stupid?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Nationals Place Andrew Chafin On 15-Day Injured List - MLB Trade Rumors
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
GTA Online Money Fronts Update Download Goes Live Early - RockstarINTEL
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.